Generosity made simple

Your church meets the expecation

Your church scored 58%
58%

Needs
improvement

Meets
expectations

Exceeds
expectations

  • CHURCH GIVING
    46%
  • LEADERSHIP GIVING
    79%
  • DIGITAL GIVING
    63%
  • STAFF GIVING
    58%
  • LOCAL GIVING
    75%
# Name Church Leadership Digital Staff Local Avg (%)
1 Mike Harroll 25 75 58.33 58.33 58.33 55
2 Robbie Rees 66.67 83.33 66.67 58.33 58.33 67
Church Average 46 79 63 58 75 64%

Detailed Report:

Celebrate what you’re doing well
  1. 1. Our church generously lets the local community use the church facility during the week.
  2. 2. Our leadership team prioritizes the need to enrich the culture of generosity in our church.
  3. 3. Our leadership team is very careful and intentional about what we say during ‘offering’ time.


Focus on what needs immediate attention
  1. 1. Our church is intentionally teaching about generosity and engaging congregants in related discussions annually.
  2. 2. Our church invests in helping our staff and volunteers model generosity cheerfully.
  3. 3. Our church uses tools like Round-Up giving to help congregants give even while making everyday purchases outside of church.
  • Review current areas of great alignment
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our church is not satisfied with the status quo of our congregation’s generosity.
      • Mike Harroll Unsure
      • Robbie Rees Absolutely true
    • Our church constantly invests into assessing and understanding what our congregation currently thinks about generosity.
      • Mike Harroll Absolutely false
      • Robbie Rees Absolutely true
    • Our church is intentionally teaching about generosity and engaging congregants in related discussions annually.
      • Mike Harroll Absolutely false
      • Robbie Rees Unsure
  • Celebrate current areas of great alignment
    • Our leadership team prioritizes the need to enrich the culture of generosity in our church.
      Absolutely true
    • Our leadership team is very careful and intentional about what we say during ‘offering’ time.
      Absolutely true
    • Our leadership team analyzes ‘giving’ data in our church to understand the relationship between our congregation’s generosity and their faith journey.
      Absolutely true
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
  • Celebrate current areas of great alignment
    • Multi-format giving (and not just online giving) across cash, checks, text, online, kiosk etc. is integrated in our church.
      Absolutely true
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our church lets people give anytime and from anywhere through online/mobile giving.
      • Mike Harroll Unsure
      • Robbie Rees Absolutely true
    • Our church uses tools like Round-Up giving to help congregants give even while making everyday purchases outside of church.
      • Mike Harroll Unsure
      • Robbie Rees Absolutely false
  • Celebrate current areas of great alignment
    • Our church staff practices what we preach by modeling giving well.
      Absolutely true
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our church invests in helping our staff and volunteers model generosity cheerfully.
      • Mike Harroll Unsure
      • Robbie Rees Absolutely false
    • Our church focuses on generosity around the year and not just during Q4.
      • Mike Harroll Unsure
      • Robbie Rees Absolutely true
  • Celebrate current areas of great alignment
    • Our church generously lets the local community use the church facility during the week.
      Absolutely true
  • Analyze potential areas for better alignment
    • Our church is generous in meeting needs around us outside our church.
      • Mike Harroll Absolutely true
      • Robbie Rees Unsure
    • The number of new givers in our congregation is consistently increasing over time.
      • Mike Harroll Unsure
      • Robbie Rees Absolutely true

Team Average Urgency Score

Participant Votes
0
0
0
2
0
  • Not
    urgent
  • Hardly
    urgent
  • Unsure
  • Slightly
    urgent
  • Absolutely
    urgent
Hurdles
  • 0
  • 0.50
Enablers
  • 0.50
  • 0.50
assessment scores